News / public record

Checking
  1. Update / Component / Scope · CheckingOLC Engine: a renewed presentation of legal workThe bilingual Engine page now presents the approved version 0.1.0 scope, its legal-work method and the boundary between current capabilities and planned expansion.
  2. Article · CheckingA Server in the Office Is Not a Security StrategyWhy an office server, cloud service, email route or encrypted backup must be assessed through capabilities, responsibility and evidence—not location alone.
  3. Article · CheckingWho Controls the Legal AI Stack?Public code can enable inspection without proving control of the whole system. Follow versions, provenance, data sovereignty, exit and regulatory roles in legal AI.
  4. Article · CheckingConfidentiality Does Not End at the Chat WindowConfidentiality is a property of the complete data path, not the chat window. What do DPAs, de-identification and local deployment solve — and why is the OLC gateway still only a concept?
  5. Article · CheckingWhen a High Score Hides a Critical Legal ErrorA high benchmark score does not establish that legal AI is dependable for every problem. This article explains how to measure critical errors, retrieval, abstention, evaluators and the path to a legal answer.
  6. Update / Component / Readiness · CheckingWord Connector public presentation is completeThe Apache-2.0 v0.1.0-beta.1 source-only release now has a complete public component record, homepage feature, Roadmap outcome and discovery path.
  7. Update / Component / Release · CheckingOpenLegalCore Word Connector v0.1.0-beta.1 is publicThe Apache-2.0 source-only beta provides a verified Word for the web path for researching Slovenian legal sources through OLC Engine, directly or through Open WebUI.
  8. Article · CheckingLegal RAG Can Fail Before the Model AnswersA genuine provision can still support the wrong answer. This article shows how collection scope, document splitting, filters and ranking determine which sources a legal AI model ever sees.
  9. Article · CheckingWhen a Correct Citation Leads to the Wrong LawA genuine provision and an official link do not prove that the right law was applied. This article explains why legal AI must preserve temporal versions, transitional rules and the source-selection path.
  10. Update / Project · CheckingPublic project foundation gate is completeOpenLegalCore has completed its public project foundation gate: core public routes, bounded participation channels and publication controls are operating.
  11. Article · CheckingAn Audit Trail Is Not a Log: What a Digital Legal Process Must PreserveAn audit trail is useful when it permits a reasonable reconstruction of the particular process while remaining purpose-bound, appropriately protected and subject to retention rules.
  12. Article · CheckingArticle 86 of the AI Act: Does the right to explanation already apply to Annex III systems?The legal question remains open. The technical capacity to provide an intelligible explanation should not.
  13. Update / Project · CheckingPrivate security reporting is now availableOpenLegalCore now provides a monitored project-wide private channel and a canonical security-reporting policy.
  14. Update / Component / Release · CheckingSlovenian Case Law Pipeline v0.1.7 is publicOpenLegalCore has published the production-verified Slovenian case-law ingestion component as a source-available BUSL-1.1 release.
  15. Article · CheckingA Result Is Not a Method: Why Visible Methods Matter in Legal AIWhy legal AI needs inspectable sources, provenance and human review: a legal and technical analysis of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act and GDPR.
  16. Update / Component / Release · CheckingSlovenian Legislation Pipeline v0.1.0 is publicOpenLegalCore has published the production-verified PISRS legislation-ingest component as a source-available BUSL-1.1 release.
  17. Update / Component / Release · CheckingLegal OCR Pipeline v0.1.2 is publicThe first public OpenLegalCore component is available with code, tests, offline review tooling and a bounded acceptance record.
Explore the code
Menu

ARTICLES / LEGAL AI READING ROOM

Read the argument.Follow the evidence.

A public reading room for OpenLegalCore’s methods, legal-source work and analysis of accountable automation. Choose a path, then inspect the complete article register.

Latest publication
Publication feed
RSS 2.0
Articles
09
Reading paths
03
Project-linked
06
Research
03

Search the article collection

ARTICLE REGISTER

Complete collection.

09 articles

Curated start · then newest first

  1. 01 / Start here · core argument

    Legal AI infrastructure

    Who Controls the Legal AI Stack?

    Public code can enable inspection without proving control of the whole system. Follow versions, provenance, data sovereignty, exit and regulatory roles in legal AI.

    READING RECORD

    Path
    Law + accountability
    Author
    Rajko Majcen
    Reading time
    37 min
    Research verified
    Read core argument

  2. Research & analysisLaw-firm data security

    A Server in the Office Is Not a Security Strategy

    Why an office server, cloud service, email route or encrypted backup must be assessed through capabilities, responsibility and evidence—not location alone.

    Reading path
    Law + accountability
    Jurisdiction
    EU + Slovenia
    Reading time
    35 min
    Read article

  3. OpenLegalCoreData path

    Confidentiality Does Not End at the Chat Window

    Confidentiality is a property of the complete data path, not the chat window. What do DPAs, de-identification and local deployment solve — and why is the OLC gateway still only a concept?

    Reading path
    Law + accountability
    Jurisdiction
    EU + Slovenia
    Reading time
    38 min
    Read article

  4. OpenLegalCoreLegal AI evaluation

    When a High Score Hides a Critical Legal Error

    A high benchmark score does not establish that legal AI is dependable for every problem. This article explains how to measure critical errors, retrieval, abstention, evaluators and the path to a legal answer.

    Reading path
    Core method
    Jurisdiction
    EU
    Reading time
    29 min
    Read article

  5. OpenLegalCoreLegal sources

    Legal RAG Can Fail Before the Model Answers

    A genuine provision can still support the wrong answer. This article shows how collection scope, document splitting, filters and ranking determine which sources a legal AI model ever sees.

    Reading path
    Legal sources
    Jurisdiction
    EU + Slovenia
    Reading time
    27 min
    Read article

  6. OpenLegalCoreLegal sources

    When a Correct Citation Leads to the Wrong Law

    A genuine provision and an official link do not prove that the right law was applied. This article explains why legal AI must preserve temporal versions, transitional rules and the source-selection path.

    Reading path
    Legal sources
    Jurisdiction
    EU + Slovenia
    Reading time
    18 min
    Read article